Our issues are not necessarily about studies. When our investigations are done and recommendations are made, some of them are very specific. They're not necessarily about studies. They could be specific recommendations about training; they could be about education; they could be about a variety of things. So it's not necessarily about our conducting a study. We're taking a look at the facts of an investigation, seeing if there are any problems with it and if the CF member has breached some mechanisms along the way. Then we make recommendations.
I can tell you that over the past four years, at least, 100% of the recommendations made within the investigative reports have been accepted by the Canadian Forces provost marshal. From that point of view, we then have a mechanism to follow up, because one of the recommendations may be an adjustment to policy or an issue with a change in policy and how you handle securing the mental health of individuals and items like that. We will follow those up to determine whether or not necessary changes have been made to the policies. But 100% of the recommendations in recent years have been accepted.
The ongoing liaison between the Canadian Forces provost marshal and the deputy provost marshal of professional standards is a regular thing. It's ongoing, so there's a constant review of files to ensure that things that are supposed to be happening are happening. It's a two-way street, and that's good.