There may be some coalescing going on, because I think there's a big interest in this search and rescue aircraft project, but it's obvious from looking at the NRC report that a lot of the assumptions built into this whole project have to do with maintaining the status quo in terms of search and rescue response times.
We're undertaking a study of search and rescue response times now, and I think maybe it is a good opportunity to talk to the ministers involved to see what the response of the department is (a) to the report, but also (b) to the fact of the need for a fuller look at search and rescue response times before we actually nail down the SOR. I think that's an issue that's pretty obvious.
I agree with the suggestion of Monsieur LeBlanc—who did not consult with me, for those who are interested. But independently I wanted to add the same point. We should have someone from NRC to talk about that particular report. If that's part of the amendment you're proposing, then I would agree with it.
Looking at the fixed wing, we should hear from the ministers, but we should also hear from one or two authors of that report, because they have some very important observations and critiques with respect to the statement of requirements.