I would say a balanced board constitution is one of the options available. You could go with all civilians, all military, or a balance. It could go anywhere in between. They would all have their advantages and disadvantages, in my view. Depending upon the angle from which you're looking at it, some would find benefits or disadvantages regardless of the model, whether it's all civilian, all military, or a mix. There are pros and cons to each model.
I believe there will be opportunities later on to review items like that--not through the review of this bill, but when the next five-year review or next seven-year review comes forward. This would of course require further study and evaluation of those advantages and disadvantages. The board would have to seriously look at these options, and, if invited, they would contribute to such a debate also.
Irrespective of the model you're looking at, I would say you could find advantages or disadvantages to any one of them.