So it's a dead end wherever he turns.
I'd like us to talk for a few minutes about the civil courts. In fact, it states here that the civil courts have stated that there is no employment contract between Her Majesty and members of the Canadian Forces and that a person who enrols in the military does so at the pleasure of the crown and that such relations between Her Majesty and her military members do not give rise to remedies in the civil courts.
I understand that they're not given access to the civil courts, but even if there were recourse, the court would probably dismiss the claim very quickly, stating that they cannot sue the Queen.
When you know that there is no employment contract, it seems to me that, when a soldier enrols in the armed forces, he signs a contract for a number of years. So there is an employment contract. Is there a legal void that precludes pursuing his claims right to the end?