Obviously, I would expect that those jurists wouldn't have just been presented with one perspective. As I have said continuously from the beginning of our presentation and throughout, this committee, Justice Lamer, and others who have examined the bills would have been presented with a wide variety of perspectives that would have informed their analysis.
As we're aware, there are many provisions that infringe the charter. For example, random stopping and RIDE programs to check for impaired driving infringe the charter, save by section 1. There may be very many cases in which the sections that I'm commenting on, the summary trial sections, from my perspective would infringe the charter, but much like the situation with regard to the RIDE programs, perhaps this committee and those who have drafted the legislation have heard other evidence that would put that into context.