They're already there. Why is it that we don't have a permanent military court? To use Mr. Hawn's point earlier, this is one of the key recommendations of Lamer, and we haven't done it. Why aren't we doing it?
I practice military law and I teach military law. I'm fully in favour of it; I want to make military law better, not less than what it is at the moment. But to make it better, it may mean that we may have to change our mindset. And that's one aspect of it. I don't see why we would resist, particularly when the rest of the world, at least the common law world, has changed and is ahead of us. As I said, we're lagging behind.