First, Mr. Chair, I think that, instead of saying that there is an impact on a group, we should say that there is a correlation. That is the first thing.
Secondly, we would like to hold a vote on amendment BQ-8 because BQ-1 is simply a definition. Amendment BQ-8 is the principle we are fundamentally defending.
So, if you agree with what I am proposing, I would like us to deal with amendment BQ-1 first, and then amendment BQ-8. We won't deal with it automatically. If amendment BQ-8 is rejected, we will support the rejection of the rest of the amendments.
Does the procedural clerk agree with my interpretation?