There would be some restrictions on what other work they could do, but they would be individuals who could perform other functions. I'm just looking for the clause.
It's at page 18 of the bill. If you look at page 18 at proposed section 165.22, you will see that there is a list of four categories of individuals who could be placed on this panel.
I think there was some information put before the committee earlier that was incorrect. It suggested that the only people who would be qualified to perform this function would be retired military judges. That's one of the classes of people who could do it, but if you look at proposed paragraph 165.22(c), there is an “or” there; it's a disjunctive list.
Starting from the top, “a barrister or advocate of at least 10 years' standing at the bar” could do this; anybody who “has been a military judge” could do this; anyone who had “presided at a Standing Court Martial or a Special General Court Martial” could do this; or anybody who “has been a judge advocate at a court martial” could do it. Those categories in proposed paragraphs (c) and (d) are fairly technical, to reflect some unique status of individuals prior to 1995 with respect to how we appointed military judges at that time, but essentially, under proposed paragraph 165.22(a), any person who “is a barrister or advocate of at least 10 years’ standing at the bar of a province” could do this, as long as they're a member of the reserve forces and they're an officer in the Canadian Forces.