When they perform their duties, it would be all set out through the compensation scheme as to how they would be paid, but no, they would not be paid on a full-time basis to do part-time work. As was pointed out, the objective here is to provide flexibility if there were to be a significant mobilization of the force.
It's particularly important from a policy perspective for you to understand that in this bil we arel introducing tenure until retirement for military judges, so if we were to respond to a mobilization type of situation and were required to move from four to twenty military judges, that might be a situation that existed for a five-year period; if we appointed 16 more military judges, when the force demobilized, those 16 military judges would be there on a full-time basis until they reached retirement age, pursuant to what this legislation does.
This also just provides general flexibility in the day-to-day operation of the chief military judge's office. Four people, while there are not a lot of courts, are also not many judges, and if somebody is sick or whatever, it is challenging for the chief judge to balance his pool of judges.