I don't know if my motion needs to be seconded.
My position would be that it's for the House to decide, not the committee. Whether it actually imposes a financial obligation is a matter of interpretation, I suppose. The question as to whether it's inadmissible is really a question for the House to decide, not the committee. Through my appeal of your ruling, frankly, I would like to just move it to the House so that the House can determine this issue on its merits. As I say, if it does in fact turn out to require a royal recommendation, then perhaps one will be forthcoming by the time this gets to the House.