Thank you.
As to your amendment, even if we change the initial BQ-3.1 amendment based on the ruling of the chair, your amendment is still inadmissible, because it contravenes the terms of the royal recommendation.
To be more specific, I will say that “[s]ince an amendment may not infringe upon the financial initiative of the Crown”, this amendment is inadmissible because it “imposes a change on the public treasury...it extends the objects or purposes or relaxes the conditions and qualifications specified in the royal recommendation”.
Therefore, I am of the opinion that this amendment proposes a new mechanism that will change the terms of the royal recommendation. As a result, the motion is out of order.