Okay. I understand. I just wanted to make sure that context was there.
If that individual is convicted by either tribunal for that offence, regardless of the seriousness of the punishment it would then be a record within the meaning of the Criminal Records Act, because it would be a conviction under a federal act of Parliament and it's not exempted in the current drafting of clause 75. So yes, they would get a criminal record within the meaning of the Criminal Records Act, but the presiding officer would in no way feel compelled to give a harsher punishment.
Maybe I misunderstood that. I'm not sure how the harsher punishment piece comes in--