Thank you.
I believe what happened the other day was that, after debate, amendment NDP-3 was passed and Mr. Hawn requested an opportunity to have a closer look at amendments NDP-4, NDP-5, NDP-6, and NDP-7, which were presented by me as consequential amendments. They were provided to me by the legislative counsel and were consequent on the amendments that we had.
It is possible--and I just say that because I don't know what Mr. Hawn has come up with in response--that some of the issues relate to another amendment that we have circulated, but which is not numbered. I think someone has graciously called it amendment NDP-3.1, but it's an amendment to clause 11 that has been circulated and refers to section 29.16 of the act.
Perhaps Mr. Hawn could respond to amendments NDP-4, NDP-5, NDP-6, and NDP-7. As I say, they were presented to me as additions required on the passage of amendment NDP-3.