Based upon the most recent dispatch from Brussels, there is to date no agreement for assuming this responsibility.
It would seem that there are two problems. On the one hand, it appears that the United States are adamant that it be an American general. Obviously, that has often been the case. On the other hand, Turkey is not in favour of air strikes.
If we are saying that there is a no-fly zone, would the sole purpose of air-to-ground attacks not be the destruction of air defence batteries? Once anti aircraft batteries have been destroyed, are other targets allowed? If we want to have a protected air zone in order for allied aircraft to be able to patrol Libyan air space in complete safety, what is it that justifies ground air strikes?