I would suggest that all three options, including option 3, which is the broadest, strike a balance, in the sense that option 3 does not exempt serious criminal conduct. That is really both with respect to the offences that are listed and also with the punishment threshold. Anything that involves a very serious fine would not be exempted, and anything that involved any kind of custodial sentence or a reduction in rank, which is also a relatively serious punishment at the end of the day, would not benefit from this exemption.
So as I said, the balance is struck, but obviously we're further down that balancing process as we get to option 3 than we are with option 1 or the original drafting of this provision.