I would like to come back to your question on judgment.
Of course we train our pilots very well. In this particular case, I don't have the details to answer whether it was a pilot judgment or it was something done in the chain of command as information came forward, but their instructions.... It's a basic principle of the Canadian Forces to avoid collateral damage, and this was a case where someone in the chain of command, be it the pilot or someone above the pilot, received information that there was something on the ground that would have caused collateral damage had they engaged. So they made the right decision not to engage.
In the case of the attack today, it was a site that was inside a fairly well identified military area. It was clearly a military target, so they were cleared to fire.