Actually, those two reports that I referred to, the work done in 2007 and 2008, formed the basis for evaluating whether or not it was necessary or desirable or affordable to move to a better posture.
I think what the statistical analysis.... When you take over 40,000 incidents and you reduce them to several in which the standby posture may have had an influence.... Every life is significant, and I won't discount that at all. But at some juncture you have to look at the overall statistics and realize that the system we have in place performed very well in dealing with the very large majority of the incidents we're talking about here.
So to move to a different posture was deemed, at least based on that evidence, not to be appropriate at this time. Now, having said that, you could at any time revisit, with reason.