To answer the last part of the question, yes, at any point in time you have the opportunity to grieve on a particular position if you believe you were not treated fairly.
To answer the first part of the question, which I think becomes the heart of this discussion, currently there is no policy in place that says you will pick this person over that person. It doesn't exist. There is no policy that says you will have this person or that person. It is now based purely on the skills that you bring to the position, and that's it, so when they look at the skills that are required for this position, I would hope the person who is chosen will have the name that's connected to the person with the skills.
I come back to my comment: therein lies the challenge for a reservist, who perhaps has not had the same opportunities as someone who has served full time in either the reserves or the regular forces. I can only assume that is being done, but there is no national policy that says you will prefer anyone over anybody else. That doesn't exist. I own that policy; it doesn't exist.
What is needed is the next step, which you touched on. That's to take a look at it to ensure that not only is the process now transparent, but also that the actual hiring process itself becomes transparent, if that's clear. We've now put it open that here are the skills and here are the people applying for it; now what happens in that selection process? That I can't tell you across the CF, because I don't hire these people.