Yes, I would not be supporting Mr. Harris's amendment. There was talk about this alleged tyranny of the majority, but we have experienced over the years the tyranny of the opposition when it had fewer members. Often what happens is that we have to split time in the meeting. And I know that you can say we'll change the witnesses' speaking time, but that always requires unanimous consent. Repeatedly government members would not have a chance to speak at all, and the party with the fewest representatives in the House would have repeated opportunities in lieu of government members.
So on that basis, I support the motion as put forth by Mr. Alexander.