There was not. I testified before many of those committees, and there were more Liberal members on the committees and they spoke more than the other members.
There is a principle of equality at the beginning and the end for the three parties. Quite frankly, we're persuaded by that.
The proposal I initially made would have had, I think, family hanging back with two Conservatives at the end. I fully intended to be one of those as often as possible, out of respect for the independence of this committee. But if our colleagues opposite prefer the subamendment, we can live with that. We would just like to be clear about exactly how much time and what order is being assigned to the three rounds.
But the sequencing of speakers that was outlined earlier strikes us as reasonable.