That comes back to one of the reasons why we consider that it's important that military judges be military officers, as you very rightly pointed out.
One of the functional attributes required in our system is portability—we conduct operations all around the world—and also flexibility, in the sense that our courts have to be able to sit in all points in the spectrum of conflict, from peacetime in garrison in Canada to a situation of armed conflict in an environment like Afghanistan. So it's very important that military judges need to be deployable, and that is again one of the reasons why they are officers and required to meet the same standards of medical and physical fitness of other officers, to ensure that if it is necessary to hold a court in Afghanistan or in the Democratic Republic of Congo, or in any other deployed setting, the officer who is a military judge is fully capable of deploying and sitting with that court in such a demanding environment.