As I said, it would have to be clearly a very grave situation such that it was considered that the judge had misconducted himself or herself to such a degree—for example, had been convicted of a serious criminal offence—or had had a stroke or something like that, which rendered the judge medically incapable of continuing in office. But the point to be made is that the purpose of the inquiry committee is to ensure that a judge could only be removed from office on extremely grave grounds and that the process to make that recommendation would be transparent and rigorous.
On November 15th, 2011. See this statement in context.