We're at the front end of actually confirming what that will look like in terms of dollars, to be honest, in terms of managing. What you're really talking about is what it would take to manage those. The operating concept is that once we have the agreements in place, then based on our level of ambition or need we would put resources to them. We tend to spend money in relation to named operations; so we don't tend to spend money if there's nothing happening in areas. I would add that caveat to it: to my mind, this is not a hugely expensive option to put in place.
Also implied is the concept that once we have the agreements piece in place, we can exercise it by potentially taking advantage of things that are already in place. For instance, if we had a hub in a part of the world, we could exercise that by having a ship visit, which happens on a normal yearly cyclical basis, based on what we do. Just having a ship come alongside and do a level of activity and potentially activating some contracts we would have in place is an example. There could be small-unit exchange or military-to-military engagements. We have a number of joint exercises that we run internationally. What I'm really suggesting or have suggested is that if the intent is to mature this, we have to take advantage of the resources that are already within the department and in use to make sure we benefit from activities already in place.