Thank you, Chair.
I didn't know if I'd get a chance to ask this or not. Assuming there is a situation where you have two needs, both pressing, and both involve Canadian citizens' lives being at risk, and you, the armed forces, cannot physically respond to both, somebody has to make a horrible decision. First of all, can you tell me who, ultimately, would make that decision and bear the responsibility? Just as important, what are the critical factors they would go through in making that decision, recognizing that normally there isn't the luxury of a lot of reflective time to call committee meetings and consult when a decision has to be made. General, who does that fall to, and what is the process that person needs to go through to reach that decision?