Any new program, especially a high-tech program, which the F-18 was, and the F-35 certainly is, entails risk management. That's a huge part of the program.
Would you say that we're better off being part of a nine-nation consortium, if you will, to manage and mitigate that risk than we were as a single nation flying the airplane? Along with that, I don't think it's fair to say there are no contingencies. The military always has contingencies developed in-house for whatever; they're just not necessarily bandied about, because then they become gospel and that becomes unproductive. But is it fair to say that risk management and contingency planning are always a part of a program like this?