So there's no contingency plan, I hear you saying.
Let me get to the numbers. Originally, the air force had recommended 80 F-35s. My colleague, Mr. McKay, suggested that when General Natynczyk was here, he had been absolutely firm that 65 was a minimum. You have recently been in the media saying that if we don't have 65, we will have to review our ability to provide concurrent activity.
Could you give me some insight into those considerations? What are the trade-offs? How does one do a review of this situation?