Okay, great.
Your report also suggests that weaknesses in the implementation and oversight of DND's contracting approaches for maintenance and repair, as well as inefficient management of the information, could hamper the department's ability to meet some of those training needs and operational requirements over the long term. How do you account, then, for DND's long-term success in Afghanistan and in other key missions such as Libya and Haiti, to name a couple? Would the Canadian Forces, do you think, be able to experience such a high level of success if it were not particularly proficient in maintenance and repair of its military equipment?