Thank you, Chair, and thank you to all of you for your thoughts.
I want to start with Dr. Skillicorn's comment that “organization matters”. Your comment was that the Brits got it right by accident—namely, that they had their signals intelligence, and their cyber-security kind of fell into the same pot, so they've carried on doing what they do. I don't know—possibly you have an opinion on this as well—how effective they are in the area of cyber-security.
On the other hand, the three gentlemen to your left have--fairly, I think--a castle model of security, namely, “These are our borders, this is what we have to protect, these are Canada's interests, and this is how we're going to go about readiness to protect those.”
You then made a comment to the effect of, “We don't even know where some of the stuff comes from, we don't know who does it, and we don't know why they do it, but it just sort of appears.”
The question, in the context of readiness, is should cyber-security be housed with the military?