Could that organization result in a closer alliance than NATO, particularly in operational terms? Politically speaking, we could definitely include 75 or 100 countries in NATO, but, from an operational standpoint, the Libya example showed us that there were actually two leaders, France and Great Britain. Five countries that took part in that mission were more followers than leaders. In addition, 21 other countries did nothing or were firmly opposed to the mission, including Germany and Turkey, which are two heavyweights in terms of population.
In short, could MIC give rise to a group that, in operational terms, would be more effective and more real than NATO, which today looks more like a social club than an operational force?