I'll start.
One thing I would say, in case my colleague doesn't, is that in part, the flexibility, agility, and ability to move and be nimble was actually from the training and education aspect Professor Windsor was talking about. It didn't seem that way at the time, but I would say that arguably, in terms of the lasting impact of the reform process in the late 1990s—the 100 recommendations to the Prime Minister and so on—the emphasis on professional development and training and all that entails, forces wide, for officers, senior NCOs, and others, was key. That particular area is one that has paid huge dividends in recent years in Afghanistan and in Libya. It really does need to be protected.
The other point I would make is that some of these technological advances are absolutely huge. I was in Afghanistan in January 2010. I found it amazing that the small UAVs, operated out of a little shed in the back of Kandahar, were essential to foot patrols going out in bandit country in southern Kandahar. The troops really relied on them. So a number of these technological advances really are extremely important.
Maybe I'll stop there.