Thanks very much for that question. I would hasten to say that I retired in 1997, so I'm not an expert in everything that's unfolded in the evolution of that centre, although you're correct that absolutely, in the context of the reform package I mentioned, enhancing that whole area was a significant part of the recommendations.
My sense is that the subsequent chiefs of defence staff, deputy ministers, and ministers have paid great attention to that. I think that's evident in both Afghanistan and Libya, where with 15 minutes' notice we had a Canadian commander.... In fact, his story is that the biggest part of the problem was banging holes in the wall so they could hook up the communication pieces.
So I would say it's gone a long way. I would say that the Kingston headquarters has played a key role in all of that, and that continues to be the case. It would certainly be my hope that it be an essential capability. As I mentioned in my comments, the balance argument isn't just navy, army, air force; it also includes joint capability. The Kingston headquarters has been a pretty key player in that, and special forces capabilities, which were kind of nascent in the early 1990s, have become an absolutely essential—in today's world—component of the capabilities of the Canadian Forces.
Maybe I'll stop there.