Well, there are official structures. I was getting into that. I was just trying to explain the culture.
For fragile states, there is a DM committee on fragile states in conflict that meets regularly. It is joint CIDA, us, and DND. Then we have governance boards for Canadian policing arrangements, for instance, or for START, writ large, etc. DND will be part of those discussions.
When we go to a specific military operation, we have structured working groups for specific interventions. On Afghanistan we had an integrated task force.
It will show up in different ways. On the Haiti quake response, for instance, we had at the beginning, three times daily, task force meetings between DND, us, CIDA, and a host of other people across government.
There are different, very structured ones.
I won't get into all of it, but around NATO, NORAD, etc., there are some structured committees that allow us to come up with integrated projects. They are structured within Canada and with partners. Then we have a whole web of political-military and military-military structured dialogues with other countries, our key partners. We do that together. We'll shift lead. We'll shift chair. We'll share chairing, depending on which one it is.
We let 1,000 flowers blossom.