Thank you.
I realize the need to be neutral, but one of the debates we're having is about making sure we provide the best equipment available and do the things this country has traditionally been able to do. It is within that context that I asked the question about expeditionary capabilities.
From a mechanical perspective, wouldn't it cause NATO a great amount of stress if a nation with expeditionary capabilities decided to no longer provide them? You would have a vacuum, so how would you approach that vacuum?