I guess we're running short on time, but specifically on weaknesses from a Canadian standpoint, I think we're losing our regional expertise. I don't think that either in Foreign Affairs or the military we are tapped into the undercurrents going on in areas that should interest us, so as to understand them. We have a tremendous multi-ethnic population resource in this country with linguistic capability, which resides in parts of the Canadian Forces as well and which could give us insights into parts of the world better than what we have now. I don't think we've exploited that to a level we could.
The second area of weakness is that we're designing forces possibly based on the last war and the last decade. I think there has to be some thinking now about what these shifts mean. At the end of the day, these are the shifts that start influencing what kind of equipment you buy, what kinds of forces you have, how you man them, what the balance of those forces is between east coast and west coast and the balances between army, navy, and air force. I don't think we have yet broken out of the various silos that drive procurement, missions, thinking, and application in various regions. I think we could do a better job of that. That's a weakness I see.