That's a great question. The evidence base is certainly not there to exclude equine therapy. We go through a review process for all different therapies, all types of adjunct therapies that exist out there. There are many things out there that can assist all of our patients in many different ways. As was pointed out, every patient is very individual and every patient has very different needs. On at least a biweekly or weekly basis, we have people presenting different options for enhancing communication between the therapist and the patient who's suffering.
There are many different ways of approaching that. We have to have a systematic approach to determining what we're going to fund and use our public funding for. However, having said that, we're not saying these are bad things. It's just whether we can commit public funds to pay for all of the different approaches that are out there. When we decide to make it a core funded program, we have to prove that there is evidence behind it to use it. But if there were an external funding source that wanted to support that, we would certainly not say no to it. We don't necessarily use the evidence base to exclude.