I think we have to be very careful, number one, to distinguish anecdotes from a systemic pattern. We also have to distinguish what people need versus what people want.
If your standard of success is to make everybody happy in terms of what they think they need and they're happy to get, then I don't think there's enough money in Canada to satisfy everybody's wants. At the end of the day, on the one hand we're talking about budget constraints right now and pressures to not only become more and more efficient but potentially even cut, and on the other hand you're saying to give people whatever they want based upon their personal desires.
One of the things that we have be very careful of is what makes you happy subjectively is not necessarily objectively what's going to take you there in the long term. For example, if someone said, “If you would fund my application to Bahamas every year, that would make me really happy because I feel depressed and everything”, is that legitimate? There's the care involving horses. That's why in the civilian sector we have all these organizations, such as the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada and the Canadian Cancer Society. These are volunteer organizations that can do some of that stuff in a relatively small population basis.