To speak to that point directly, Mr. McKay, I'm not a legal scholar. I was more of a practitioner. I do sometimes believe that legislators, and even the Department of Justice, suffer from a bit of constitutional constipation. They focus so fastidiously on whether this will pass the charter that perhaps no amendments would ever be made to legislation.
We have a very capable, rigorous examination by trusted, capable lawyers within the Department of National Defence in our Judge Advocate General's department. This is a separate system of justice. We're talking about our military justice system. There is expertise within the department that would not only examine the constitutionality of this but would try to anticipate, as you've suggested, these messy situations.
I'm not a strict adherent to Cartesian thinking that we have to try to codify and write down every single situation in anticipation of somehow preventing breaches of the law. It simply doesn't work that way.