All I'm saying is the Treasury Board directive on claims and ex gratia payments states very clearly that the directive is not used to fill perceived gaps or compensate for the apparent limitations in any act, order, regulation, policy, agreement, or other governing instruments.
All I'm saying is if the CDS is to compensate someone who has been wronged in any financial grievance that has a tie directly to Treasury Board or not, at the end of the day it will be subject to this condition. Therefore, if it's perceived he wanted to give money to redress a grievance, if it's perceived that it's to fill a gap in law, it will not be approved. That's Treasury Board conditions.