Going back to this whole business of ex gratia and your view that it's maybe a step forward, I might suggest to you that it's a step sideways rather than a step forward. If I look at your recommendation, it says:
The board recommends that the statutory authority of the CDS as Final Authority be amended in such a way so as to ensure that he/she has an appropriate financial delegation. This will enable him/her to make a decision on financial compensation where this form of relief is sought as redress.
The way I read that, and maybe you can correct me if I'm wrong, is that the CDS can take your recommendation and make a decision and write a cheque.
So what is different about this order in council from June of last year?