And I don't do defence work, so I cannot really say. We have an internal police, the military police, who wear a military rank. They are subject to orders and subject to the code of service discipline; it's difficult enough for them to be seen and perceived as independent, and now we have the head of the military police, a provost marshal, receiving instructions in an investigation from the Vice Chief of the Defence Staff, who's one step away from the Chief of the Defence Staff. Do you want to pretend that it is independent when they are investigating...who knows? They could be investigating the CDS, who's also subject to the code of service discipline.
To me it makes no sense. I wouldn't even know where to begin to argue that this in fact is compatible with the notion of independence. It's not.