Thank you. I'll respond in English, if you don't mind.
Of course there are no guarantees that somebody won't acquire a record if convicted of an offence that isn't on the exemption list. What the proposal is actually engaging is a policy assessment of where to draw the line.
Under the previous version.... We conducted the statistical analysis under the original version, if I may call it that, of clause 75, and that assessment indicated that on the basis of those provisions, approximately 81% would have been exempted. What we're really talking about, in terms of the difference between the two versions, is an increment from 81% to 94%.
As I explained earlier, the policy basis for that provision is that it looks at both the objective gravity of the offence and the subjective gravity. There are some section 83 offences that are punishable by life imprisonment—the most serious objectively grave offence Parliament can create—that aren't on the list. If you were charged with that offence, convicted, and given a very serious sentence, then yes, you would acquire a record.