Well, let me respond to that, Mr. McKay, by first of all saying that the notion or the conclusion that's it's interference—or improper interference, which is a bit more accurate, I think—is an assertion. The accountability framework is a policy document; it's an administrative document. It's just an “admin document”, in essence.
What Parliament is being asked to consider, and this committee in particular, is what should be required statutorily. The key point here is that this isn't somehow a reversal of previous policy. As I said earlier in response to Ms. Gallant's question, it's recognizing the reality that there will be a requirement in certain exceptional circumstances for intervention, which has to be transparent, in order to recognize the unique circumstances. Let me—