This is a technical question, I guess.
Proposed section 101.1 says:
Every person who, without lawful excuse, fails to comply with a condition...or a condition of an undertaking...is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable to imprisonment for less than two years or to less punishment.
I guess maybe we're jumping the gun here. It's called a conviction, but this is one of the offences, under proposed section 101.1, for which it would be deemed that there would not be a conviction, so if the amendment proposed by the government to clause 75 passed, this would not result in a criminal offence. Is that right?