Very briefly, Mr. Chair, what this amendment is meant to do is harmonize the use of the phrase “military justice” throughout the act so that it will be used consistently. That's its primary intent.
If you're asking for a policy explanation or a philosophical explanation of military justice, it really goes back to the two purposes of military justice set out in clause 62 of the bill: in essence, to promote operational effectiveness and to do justice.
I would just point out that really, the primary intent of this particular provision is to be in consistency with the judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada, in the Hall case, about the tertiary ground. That's really the thrust of this amendment.