Point of order, Mr. Chair.
Mr. Chairman, our colleague opposite continues to repeat what he has already said. These pontifications and hypotheticals have gone beyond absurd. He has even stated that Colonel Gibson has explained objective and subjective gravity offences and how they apply to sentencing.
You have referred to the rules of order, and yet you continue to allow the opposition to abuse these witnesses, and I respectfully request that you exercise and apply the rules of relevance.