Yes. As part of the healthy review process, we're going through another level of review right now to make sure that our awarding of equivalencies, if you will, is fair and based on an individual's level of service and the skill sets they bring in. That's a constant thing.
There are always checks and balances. We want to be cautious that we don't create two groups, in the sense of allowing that foot in the door to grow apart the two components of the army, because it really is one army at the moment. So it's a fine balance, but we do look at that. We look at the experiential skill set whenever a soldier transfers in and does a component transfer. We use a format, a methodology, that allows us to look at all the skill sets, the courses they've taken, and to figure out what they need to do to top that up. And it's a risk assessment in terms of your institution. We can accept more risk at more junior levels. As you get into higher leadership levels, you have to accept a little less risk because then you don't necessarily have the time to catch up on all they've missed.