I can certainly address that. Ma'am, I've got to tell you, I haven't heard any criticisms of the Canadian participation in the operation, or any suggestion that our contribution to the mission was insufficient in comparison to others.
The first point I'd like to make is that as we go into these alliance operations—and we've been in NATO from the outset—we approach these in a team environment where everyone contributes. Our contribution has been valued. The Secretary General has gone on the record highlighting Canada's role, and certainly by having General Bouchard in command, our role has been highlighted.
In terms of statistics, we flew 6% of all sorties that were flown, and a higher percentage, almost 9%, of all strike sorties flown. Those are ones that are delivering ordnance on the ground in Libya to enforce the UN Security Council resolution. We carried out a like number of air-to-air refuelling missions, dispensing scores of millions of pounds of fuel to keep other allies in the air. Our maritime contribution was something in the neighbourhood of 460-odd hailings, and a number of boardings to enforce the arms embargo.
As we've discussed with our allies, I think the consensus is that Canada has answered the call, that Canadian force of arms in this operation has been a significant contribution to the effectiveness of Operation Unified Protector, and it's for that reason, as I said at the outset, that we derive a lot of pride.
So I haven't heard anything....
Marius, did you want to add something?