Thank you very much.
I want to come back to what you said, Ms. Martin, about the framework agreed upon with the NTC. I'm having some trouble with the vagueness of the replies. If, as the parliamentary secretary says, we have a successful textbook case here, then one would assume that part of it is looking forward as a military mission begins to come to an end. I can only imagine that there must be all kinds of plans laid for what we'll do. That's the question we have: what is Canada actually going to do from this point on?
We know the minister was there, and we know he took businesses with him. You've said it's important to have a reinvestment, and that's certainly understandable. When Marie Gervais-Vidricaire laid out the UN role, she specified very clearly that the UN would do this, other elements would do a social assessment, and some people were going to look at electoral functions. It seems that there is some specificity for other organizations or countries, but we don't yet have any understanding what it will be for Canada.
Can you give us any direction on what the focus will be? Will it be on building the military or the police? Will it be on civil society and women? I don't have a sense of where we're headed, from the answers you've given today.