Major-General, you mentioned actors, and I thought that was very important. I think the complexity of actors when it comes to the different threats that can exist, whether they have the capacity or the intent of using it.... You mentioned countries, but I think it's getting more and more complex where it's small groups, even criminal groups, that have military, or associations with terrorist groups. The complexity is there.
Do you think the threat would be more ballistic or in any other form? What's generally on the table in terms of nuclear, chemical, and even EMPs we haven't seen but could eventually be there? It could be in a suitcase, or in a van.
Is it more the probability within the capacity that's there than actually a country building up an armament with diplomatic intent?