We are making full advantage. I can't comment on individual cases. What I can say, though, is that when expert external observers evaluate our handling of individual cases and our general policy and program, their findings and their opinions are typically that it's the model. There are individual cases where we can question whether or not the right in-patient care decisions were made, but in general, access—unlike for the rest of the population—is unlimited based on what the clinical judgment requires, so we will spend any amount of money.
Even back when we had about $38.6 million a year as our mental health budget, already it was six times what any other jurisdiction spent per capita for mental health in Canada, and that was before we got the extra $11.4 million. Access and expense are not restrictions based on clinical judgment. Whatever the best clinical judgment is in an individual case, which sometimes is not an agreement between the clinicians, the family, and the individual, we will resource.